<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microchipping:  Should it be mandatory?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doggies.com/blog/2008/06/06/microchipping-should-it-be-mandatory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doggies.com/blog/2008/06/06/microchipping-should-it-be-mandatory/</link>
	<description>All Dog, all the time!  News, photos, reviews, guides and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:56:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gloria</title>
		<link>http://doggies.com/blog/2008/06/06/microchipping-should-it-be-mandatory/comment-page-1/#comment-2143</link>
		<dc:creator>Gloria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doggies.com/blog/?p=215#comment-2143</guid>
		<description>I personally am against mandatory microchipping and spay/neuter of pets.  I think the problem is really making those available at a reasonable cost.   It&#039;s just easier for bureaucrats to make laws, and make money off fines, rather than solve problems.  The problem is making it dependably available at a reasonable cost, which can be done, and is shown to be effective.

I&#039;ve heard the approach of &quot;if you can afford it, don&#039;t get a cat/dog/bird&quot;, but that&#039;s pretty selfish.  This law can require individuals to spend quite a bit of  money, after the fact, without any</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally am against mandatory microchipping and spay/neuter of pets.  I think the problem is really making those available at a reasonable cost.   It&#8217;s just easier for bureaucrats to make laws, and make money off fines, rather than solve problems.  The problem is making it dependably available at a reasonable cost, which can be done, and is shown to be effective.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard the approach of &#8220;if you can afford it, don&#8217;t get a cat/dog/bird&#8221;, but that&#8217;s pretty selfish.  This law can require individuals to spend quite a bit of  money, after the fact, without any</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Better Than a Microchip? : Doggies.com Dog Blog</title>
		<link>http://doggies.com/blog/2008/06/06/microchipping-should-it-be-mandatory/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Better Than a Microchip? : Doggies.com Dog Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doggies.com/blog/?p=215#comment-282</guid>
		<description>[...] of you wrote to me with strong feelings one way or the other when I posted about microchipping last month.  See what you think of this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of you wrote to me with strong feelings one way or the other when I posted about microchipping last month.  See what you think of this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth C</title>
		<link>http://doggies.com/blog/2008/06/06/microchipping-should-it-be-mandatory/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doggies.com/blog/?p=215#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Personally I believe ALL dogs should be microchipped. It is the responsible thing to do. I learned the hard way what can happen when you do not have a dog microchipped - my dog was in a high kill shelter for 7 days, and had I not shown up when I did, he was about to be neutered and adopted out to someone else. 
 Also due to the high incidence of strays this should also be a means to have the dogs returned to owners. Personally if you can not afford to get the chip, then do not get the dog. Collars do not always stay on dogs, tags can get lost. Tattoes are useless, unless you know the exact location. So yes I am pro micro chipping for these reasons. And yes it should be mandatory/
 Thank you for your time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I believe ALL dogs should be microchipped. It is the responsible thing to do. I learned the hard way what can happen when you do not have a dog microchipped &#8211; my dog was in a high kill shelter for 7 days, and had I not shown up when I did, he was about to be neutered and adopted out to someone else.<br />
 Also due to the high incidence of strays this should also be a means to have the dogs returned to owners. Personally if you can not afford to get the chip, then do not get the dog. Collars do not always stay on dogs, tags can get lost. Tattoes are useless, unless you know the exact location. So yes I am pro micro chipping for these reasons. And yes it should be mandatory/<br />
 Thank you for your time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
